In a recent blog post discussing education in Malawi I mentioned that I thought corruption contributed to the precariousness of life for orphans in Neno. While I was referring mostly to my own suspicions of minor local corruption within some of the social service departments, I was asked in a response what I thought about large-scale corruption and aid-dependence in Africa. Particularly in response to the following article by Sorious Samura from the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7740652.stm.
In the article the author states that African countries have had enough time and enough aid since independence to pull themselves out of poverty. Samura proceeds to assert that foreign aid is actually contributing to corrupt leadership in many countries as leaders learn to respond to poorly focused aid agencies instead of their own people. This type of aid actually rewards corruption.
While Samura makes some valid points about foreign aid and corruption, I do agree that donors should do a better job of ensuring aid is result-driven, corruption alone plays less of a role in Africa’s current state than his article suggests. Edward O’Neil, author of Awakening Hippocrates, notes that in Kenya people
…have been poor for generations because of many complex and interwoven factors, including: the population explosion; the social and economic costs of illnesses such as AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis; a relatively short time to recover from decades of colonial exploitation; ineffective governance modeled after colonial practices; lack of basic infrastructure; unfair global trade practices; debt repayments that rob vital social services; lack of foreign capital infusion; subjugation to global powers like the World Bank and the international Monetary Fund; ineffective and occasionally destructive “foreign aid” (2006)
African states were carved out during colonization and founded on institutionally corrupt governments in which a majority of the population was exploited. It is probably not surprising given the historical context in which African countries exist that there is some level of corruption. But as Dr. O’Neil mentions, there are many other factors.
Since independence, trade agreements, debt repayment and insufficient foreign aid have all been major factors. Mr. Samura notes towards the end of his article that since independence, trade agreements have often worked against African nations, some refer to these types of practices, in which the west continues to exploit developing countries as neocolonialism. He sites the example of the Ugandan cotton industry being unable to compete internationally due to U.S. subsidized cotton farming. When wealthy western countries pour subsidized food aid into countries, the problem becomes even more severe. The U.S. has pushed food aid into much of the Caribbean in recent decades. These practices have destroyed the internal farming industries in countries like Haiti and Jamaica and left them with devastating food insecurity issues. The documentary Life + Debt describes how heavily subsidized U.S. milk powder is dumped on Jamaica as unsubsidized local milk producers are quickly driven out of business. The same is true in many parts of Africa. Aid fuels the U.S. economy at the cost of developing economies. Again, aid should be given responsibly. In this sense, western aid certainly can have devastating consequences. Ultimately, the factors mentioned above work together to hinder development.
But what about corruption? We certainly hear of corruption often in Africa, and its effects can be truly devastating due to the precarious position in which much of Africa lives. The following map from Transparence International shows that many of the most corrupt nations are in sub-Saharan Africa http://www.transparency.org/content/download/24101/360189. Malawi’s last president, Muluzi, who was in power from 1994-2004, was reputed to be exceptionally corrupt. In fact he was arrested just last week on one of roughly 80 outstanding corruption charges. In a particularly egregious case toward the end of his rule, maize stocks were allegedly sold to foreign governments, threatening food security for many Malawians. The location of the revenue generated from the sale is unknown. Events such as this have a devastating impact on people in such a poor country. In contrast, large scale corruption in the U.S. hardly effects the average U.S. citizen.
In 1994, Bingu Mutharika, Malawi’s current president was elected, who took a strong stand against corruption. Based on what I’ve gathered over the last six months his efforts have been effective. Crime has dropped as well as low-level corruption. However, Malawi is ranked 164th out of 177 countries on the human development index and has the lowest GDP of the 174 countries assessed in 2008. Needless to say it remains extremely poor.
Last week I returned to the social welfare office in Neno to again plead them to help my young friend. I was told that there was some food support, but it was in Lilongwe and there was no way to get it over the long rocky dirt road leading to Neno. In addition, the social welfare officer claimed that the national program for orphans and vulnerable children had only received 700,000 of the 7 million they had been promised in funding. He would be able to provide a few exercise books and a blanket. It would be a start.
In 1970, at the UN general assembly, developed nations pledged to spend 0.7% of their gross national income(GNI) on foreign aid by the mid-1970s. This goal was never realized and the average spending for developed countries has remained between 0.2% and 0.4%. The United States was consistently been one of the lowest spenders in terms of percent GNI.
African nations must work to reduce corruption. Malawi has done a great job of this over the last five years. But we should not point to corruption as the cause of poverty and suffering in Africa, at least not African corruption. Developed countries can provide aid and support and do so in a fair manner. So many of the interactions between the west and developing countries in the last fifty years have been a continuation of the colonial structure in which resources continue to be funneled out of Africa with little if any benefit to the African people. Trade agreements can be re-worked. Foreign aid can be allocated in a result-driven manner with fewer strings attached and debts can be canceled. All of these factors would contribute to increasing the availability of resources for essential public services such as health and education. Two basic rights my young friend has often been deprived of during his lifetime.